¶1AFTER REMANDMENT
¶2In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Clisby v. *99State, 456 So.2d 95 (Ala.1983), this cause is remanded for the trial court’s reconsideration of its handling of Dr. Estock’s report in view of the holdings of Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982).
¶3REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
¶4Appeal after remand, Ala.Cr.App., 456 So.2d 99.