Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 S.W.2d 19 - State v. Stuart

State v. Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
4
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably State v. Antwine (1987), State v. Mathenia (1986)

71 state decisions

3401970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Giordenello v. United States · State v. Lock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In State v. Stuart, 456 S.W.2d 19 (Mo. banc 1970), the following language appears at page 22: “ ‘The law is established in this state that the silence of an accused while under arrest is not admissible against him because he is under no duty to speak . . . We now hold that an accused’s failure to volunteer an exculpatory statement is -not admissible as an admission; that it may not be shown that by his silence he failed to deny or explain while under arrest an incriminating fact as to which no question was asked. See: 22A C.J.S. Criminal Law § 734(1) a, p. 1072. The admission of such evidence constitutes an invasion of an accused’s constitutional rights. State v. Battles, supra, 357 Mo. 1223 , 212 S.W.2d 753 at 757 [9].’ ””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Jerskey v. State · State v. Richardson
  2. “Did either one of these guys claim the money?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Halk · State v. Mabie

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.