Grundstrom v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ * * * [cjonvictions based on eyewitness identification at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside on that ground only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. This standard accords with our resolution of a similar issue in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 301-302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972-1973 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 ], and with decisions of other courts on the question of identification by photograph.””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Proctor v. State · Smith v. State

2. “The above does not amount to testimony of a communication between husband and wife as denounced by Article 38.11, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. The husband-wife privilege concerning testimony of communications applies to utterances and not acts.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Martinez v. State