Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 456 U.S. 444 - Greene v. Lindsey

Greene v. Lindsey’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

699
cited by 699 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
32
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

115 federal appellate · 24 district · 372 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 699 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2025 · most notably Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams (1983), Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope (1988)

115 federal appellate · 24 district · 372 state decisions — followed in 32 states

245019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedLindsey v. Greene (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Shaffer v. Heitner · Pennoyer v. Neff · Ferguson v. Skrupa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 699 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[I]t is clear that, in the circumstances of this case, merely posting notice on an apartment door does not satisfy minimum standards of due process. In a significant number of instances, reliance on posting * * * results in a failure to provide actual notice to the tenant concerned. * * * As the process servers were well aware, notices posted on apartment door's * * * were ‘not infrequently’ removed by children or other tenants before they could have their intended effect.” (Footnote omitted.)”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “be judged in the light of its practical application to the affairs of men as they are ordinarily conducted.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.