State v. Concannon’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably State v. Parkhurst (1993), State v. Dufault (1988)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. United States · United States v. Bailey · Hartman v. United States · State v. Coelho · In Re Ouimette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(6) a written list of the names and addresses of all persons whom the attorney for the State expects to call as witnesses at the trial in support of the State’s direct case; (7)as to those persons whom the State expects to call as witnesses at the trial, all relevant recorded testimony before a grand jury of such persons and all written or recorded verbatim statements, signed or unsigned, of such persons and, if no such testimony or statement of a witness is in the possession of the State, a summary of the testimony such person is expected to give at the trial[.]””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]rocedural prejudice occurs when defense counsel must proceed to trial unprepared.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McManus · State v. Morejon“(1) the reason for nondisclosure, (2) the extent of prejudice to the opposing party, (3) the feasibility of rectifying that prejudice by a continuance, and (4) any other relevant factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McManus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.