Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

457 F.2d 1315

Docket No. 72-1518.

Mitchell v. Genung

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-04-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1972

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Troy State University v. Dickey · Lebus v. Seafarers' International Union of North America

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, Fla., James T. Russell, State's Atty., Clearwater, Fla., Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tampa, Fla., for respondent-appellant.

Joel P. Yanchuck, St. Petersburg, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

It appearing that the appeal in this court as well as the habeas proceeding in the district court are now moot because of the subsequent plea of guilty by appellee to the state charges in question, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded to the district court with direction to dismiss the proceeding as being moot. Cf. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 1950, 340 U.S. 36, 39-40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36; Troy State University v. Dickey, 5 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 515, 516-517; Lebus, Regional Director v. Seafarers' Int'l Union, 5 Cir., 1968, 398 F.2d 281, 283, on the procedure to be followed by the court of appeals in dismissing a case by reason of mootness.

¶2

Vacated and remanded with directions.

/457/f2d/1315 · .json · Public domain