Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.2d 1377 - Marvin W. BROWN, Appellant, v. GASTON COUNTY DYEING MACHINE COMPANY, Appellee

Marvin W. BROWN, Appellant, v. GASTON COUNTY DYEING MACHINE COMPANY, Appellee’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.2d 1377 · 1972

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

109 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2014 · most notably International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States (1977), Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. (1975)

109 federal appellate · 18 district · 3 state decisions

133019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. · Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc. · Robinson v. Lorillard Corp. · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Here, in the absence of objective criteria applied to all workers alike, the statistics indicate that race is the only identifiable factor explaining the disparity between the jobs held by white employees and those held by black employees. The proof discloses no objective standards based on education, experience, ability, length of service, reliability, or aptitude to account for the preferential employment of white workers . . . [Thus] the lack of objective guidelines for hiring and promotion and the failure to post notices of job vacancies are badges of discrimination that serve to corrobo rate, not to rebut, the racial bias pictured by the statistical pattern of the company’s work force.” 457 F.2d at 1383.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “badges of discrimination that serve to corroborate, not to rebut, the racial bias pictured by the statistical pattern of the ... work force.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failure to establish 'fixed or reasonably objective standards and procedures for hiring' is a discriminatory practice”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.