Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.2d 745 - Sam Andrew' Sons v. Mitchell

Sam Andrew' Sons v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.2d 745 · 1972

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2006

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

701972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1103 (§ 103 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1181 (§ 211 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Graham v. Richardson · Johnson v. Eisentrager · Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding · Boske v. Comingore · Kirby v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “founded 'on considerations rationally related to the statute [it] is administering.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In a case dealing with regulation of alien workers, the Court said, “Any person within the United States, citizen or alien, resident or non-resident, is protected by the guarantees of the Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.