Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

457 F.2d 802

Docket No. 71-3090 Summary Calendar.*

Holland v. Purdy

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-03-17

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Billie Austin X. Bryant v. Olin G. Blackwell, Warden · Carter v. Eyman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-03-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2018

13 federal appellate ·

8019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Benjamin Alfonso Holland, pro se.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Before BELL, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

This is an appeal from the district court's dismissal of Holland's petition for injunctive relief, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1983. We vacate and remand.

¶2

In his petition in the district court, Holland contended that he had been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment from June 16, 1971 until June 29, 1971, while incarcerated at the Dade County, Florida, Jail. He alleged that he was subjected to physical duress, and that the officials at the jail refused to permit him to see a notary public or send out any legal documents. In his complaint, Holland sought to have the officials at the Dade County Jail enjoined from such practices.

¶3

At the time his pleadings were filed in the district court, Holland had been transferred from the Dade County Jail to another penal institution in the State of Florida. Since Holland was no longer subjected to the complained-of conditions at the time this litigation was instituted, nor is he at the present time, the petition should have been dismissed on the ground of mootness. McCarroll v. Morrow, 5 Cir. 1971, 435 F.2d 560; Bryant v. Blackwell, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 1203.

¶4

The judgment of the district court dismissing the action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted is vacated and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the action on the ground of mootness.

¶5

Vacated and remanded.

/457/f2d/802 · .json · Public domain