Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.3d 1048 - United States v. Battershell

United States v. Battershell’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.3d 1048 · 2006

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably United States v. Hill (2006), United States v. Krupa (2011)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

150200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2256

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · New York v. P. J. Video, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Federal law defines five categories of “sexually explicit conduct” with respect to child pornography. The first four categories deal with specific conduct that is easy to identify and describe: “(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; (ii) bestiality; (iii) masturbation; [and] (iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse.... ” The fifth category ... is the “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “terse description, absent an accompanying photograph, is insufficient to establish probable cause that the photograph lasciviously exhibited the genitals or pubic area because [its] conclusory statement is an inherently subjective analysis and it is unclear if the photograph exhibited the young female’s genitals or pubic area.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he fifth category, which turns on the meaning of 'lascivious,' is far more subjective and open to interpretation than the first four.” Battershell, 457 F.3d at 1051 . Because of this, the court in Battershell concluded that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.