Howard v. Ulibarri’s Empirical Analysis
457 F.3d 1146 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Robinson v. Golder · Walkowiak v. Haines · 9 F. App'x 798 - Truelove v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“review with respect to the pertinent judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Collins v. Ercole
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.