Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.3d 264 - Britt v. Garcia

Britt v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.3d 264 · 2006

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Myers v. Hertz Corp. (2010), Cine SK8, Inc. v. Town of Henrietta (2007)

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

370200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Griffin v. Breckenridge · Johnson v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To state a civil rights conspiracy under § 1985(3), a plaintiff must allege: 1) a conspiracy; 2) for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; and 3) an act in furtherance of the conspiracy; 4) whereby a person is either injured in his person or property or deprived of any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this unusual posture does not affect the viability of the qualified immunity defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.