Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.3d 432 - Frazar v. Ladd

Frazar v. Ladd’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.3d 432 · 2006

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Demahy v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc. (2012), League of United Latin American Citizens v. City of Boerne (2011)

13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

270200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994)

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail · Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools Independent School District No 89 Oklahoma County Oklahoma v. L Dowell · Freeman v. Pitts · Frew on Behalf of Her Daughter Frew et al. v. Hawkins Commissioner Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the • judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6)any other reason that justifies relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the latest chapter in the suit to improve Texas administration of the Medicaid program to afford health care to the certified class of indigent children”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We review de novo ... any questions of law underlying the district court's decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.