Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.3d 688 - Hollander v. Brown

Hollander v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.3d 688 · 2006

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Schmidt v. Skolas (2014), Cancer Foundation, Inc. v. Cerberus Capital Management, LP (2009)

6 federal appellate · 25 district · 1 state decisions

590200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · Walker v. Armco Steel Corp. · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York · 85 Ill. 2d 161 - Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “dismissal under [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 12(b)(6) on the basis of a limitations defense may be appropriate when the plaintiff effectively pleads herself out of court by alleging facts that are sufficient to establish the defense”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] sudden, traumatic event is one that, because of its force or violence, permits the law to presume that the event immediately placed the plaintiff on notice of her injury and a right of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cause of action accrues on the date of the traumatic event, and the limitations period does not begin anew simply because a latent condition later may arise from the same occurrence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.