Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 F.3d 711 - Massey v. Johnson

Massey v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

457 F.3d 711 · 2006

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Nagle v. Village of Calumet Park (2009), Cady v. Sheahan (2006)

25 federal appellate ·

670200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Garcetti v. Ceballos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “summary judgment should be granted when, in light of the defendant's unrebutted evidence, 'the court can say without reservation that a reasonable finder of fact would be compelled to credit the employer's case on this point.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At the summary judgment stage, this means a plaintiff must produce evidence upon which a rational finder of fact could infer that the defendant's proffered reason is a lie.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the persuasiveness of an employer's non-retaliatory explanation ... is 'for the finder of fact to assess.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.