Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 FAPPX 35 - Cedeño v. Castillo

Cedeño v. Castillo’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)

Relies on Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation · Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd. · Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New York · Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.