457 F. Supp. 2d 571 - Moffett v. Computer Sciences Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2201 (Arson Prevention Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 4001 (Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012) · 42 U.S.C. § 4013 · 42 U.S.C. § 4017 · 42 U.S.C. § 4071 · 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Jenkins v. McKeithen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Director [Administrator of FEMA] shall be authorized to adjust and make payment of any claims for proved and approved losses covered by flood insurance, and upon the disallowance by the Director of any such claim ... the claimant ... may institute an action against the Director on such claim in the United States district court for the district in which the insured property or the major part thereof shall have been situated, and original exclusive jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon such court to hear and determine such action without regard to the amount in controversy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“federal funds may very well be at stake in connection with procurement fraud claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.