Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 Md. 513 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jones · United States v. Jones · United States v. Jones · Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc. · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]xpert testimony is required 'only when the subject of the inference ... is so particularly related to some science or profession that is beyond the ken of the average layman[; it] is not required on matters of which the jurors would be aware by virtue of common knowledge.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “tracking reports from GPS devices concealed in currency stolen from banks, data reports from GPS monitoring devices worn by probationers, and data on a GPS device seized from drug smuggling boat,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[c]ourts in other jurisdictions have admitted evidence derived from GPS tracking devices over objections to the lack of technical expertise of the sponsoring witness,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.