Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 P2D 226 - Grossman v. State

Grossman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
17
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably United States v. Twigg (1978), State v. Doran (1983)

4 federal appellate · 46 state decisions — followed in 17 states

210196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McNabb v. United States · Sorrells v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Masciale v. United States · United States v. Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . [Entrapment occurs when a public law enforcement official, ... in order to obtain evidence of the commission of an offense, induces another person to commit such an offense by persuasion or inducement which would be effective to persuade an average person, other than one who is ready and willing, to commit such an offense. . . .””
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is plain enough that the underlying basis of entrapment is found in public policy, as discerned and announced by the courts. As Judge Learned Hand perceptively observed in United States v. Becker, 62 F.2d 1007, 1009 (2d Cir. 1933), ‘The whole doctrine derives from a spontaneous moral revulsion against using the powers of government to beguile innocent, though ductile, persons into lapses which they might otherwise resist.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In applying the objective test we do not mean that the course of conduct between the officer and the defendant should be ignored. The transactions leading up to the offense, the interaction between the officer and the defendant, and the defendant’s response to the inducements of the officer are all to be considered in judging what the effect of the officer’s conduct would be on a normal person.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.