Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 So. 2d 1012 - Copeland v. State

457 So. 2d 1012 - Copeland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably Rolling v. State (1997), Knight v. Dugger (1988)

36 state decisions

1801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Enmund v. Florida · Dobbert v. Florida · Proffitt v. Florida · Murphy v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the general state of mind of the inhabitants of a community is so infected by knowledge of the incident and accompanying prejudice, bias, and preconceived opinions that jurors could not possibly put these matters out of their minds and try the case solely on the evidence presented in the courtroom.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “murder was the culmination of a course of events that began when appellant went into a store, robbed the clerk at gunpoint, and abducted her from the store.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In the present case, by contrast, 20 of 78 persons questioned were excused because they indicated an opinion as to petitioner's guilt. This may indeed be 20 more than would occur in the trial of a totally obscure person, but it by no means suggests a community with sentiment so poisoned against petitioner as to impeach the indifference of jurors who displayed no animus of their own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.