457 So. 2d 1136 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “this does not mean the period will be extended automatically or in every case. In most cases, the court will expect the time limits for filing to be complied with. However, when defendant will not suffer prejudice or be deprived of adequate notice, the court may, in its sound discretion, allow the state to file an untimely notice of cross appeal.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 898 So. 2d 134 - WICCAN RELIGIOUS CO-OP. OF FLA. v. Zingale

2. “[b]ecause the court gains jurisdiction over the entire cause at the time the notice of appeal is filed, neither the timely filing of a notice of cross appeal, nor the failure to timely file such a notice will affect the jurisdiction of the appellate court”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 898 So. 2d 134 - WICCAN RELIGIOUS CO-OP. OF FLA. v. Zingale

3. “the filing period may be extended for good cause.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 898 So. 2d 134 - WICCAN RELIGIOUS CO-OP. OF FLA. v. Zingale