457 So. 2d 1172 - State v. Tanner’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2014 · most notably 952 So. 2d 112 - State v. Price (2006), 517 So. 2d 799 - State v. Rowell (1988)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · 316 So. 2d 100 - State v. Jones · 418 So. 2d 609 - State v. Green · State v. Wilkerson · 360 So. 2d 853 - State v. Graham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it would serve the orderly administration of justice and further insure the defendant a fair trial if the admissibility of the [attorney-client communications] could be determined in a pretrial proceeding.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““This court has repeatedly recognized the importance of establishing safeguards to guarantee the accuracy of chemical tests. In a criminal prosecution, before the state may avail itself of the statutory presumption of defendant’s intoxication, arising from chemical analysis of his blood, without violation of his constitutional due process guarantee of a fair trial, it must show that the state has promulgated detailed procedures which will insure the integrity and reliability of the chemical test, including provisions for repair, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, certification, and chemical accuracy. It must also show that the state has strictly complied with the promulgated procedures. State v. Krause, 405 So.2d 832 (La.1981); State v. Morrison, [ 392 So.2d 1037 (La.1980) ] supra; State v. Goetz, [ 374 So.2d 1912 (La.1979)] supra; State v. Graham, [ 360 So.2d 853 (La.1978)] supra; State v. Jones, 316 So.2d 100 (La.1975).””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]here no procedure is specifically described by this Code or by statute, the court may proceed in a manner consistent with the spirit and provisions of this Code and other applicable statutory and constitutional provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.