Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 So. 2d 541 - Voce v. State

457 So. 2d 541 - Voce v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Richardson · Nyquist v. Mauclet · Grosso v. Commonwealth · United States v. Slobodkin · 98 Wis. 2d 188 - City of Madison v. Schultz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “; therefore, the trial court unnecessarily decided the constitutionality of the statute which purported to confer such jurisdiction. Consequently, it was also error for the trial court to determine that the statute was unconstitutional on its face. A legislative enactment is void on its face or facially invalid only”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if it cannot be applied constitutionally to any factual situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.