State v. Mayberry’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2016
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 354 So. 2d 552 - State v. Matthews · State v. Richardson · 362 So. 2d 1071 - State v. Kelly · 377 So. 2d 58 - State v. Sterling · 380 So. 2d 1340 - State v. Fisher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The use of such [demonstrative] evidence is left within the sound discretion of the trial judge, who can decide best whether they serve a proper place in the jury’s enlightenment; his ruling in this respect will not be disturbed in the absence of an abuse of discretion.” (cita tions omitted). State v. Mayberry, 457 So.2d 880 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1984).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.