Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 SW2D 261 - James v. James

James v. James’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2005

15 state decisions

701970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rallihan v. Motschmann · Galilean Children's Home, Inc. v. Ball · Reynardus v. Garcia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Accordingly, we hold that the natural parent is entitled to the custody of his child unless it is shown that the natural parent (1) is unsuitable to have custody, or (2) is harmful to the child, or (3) has contracted to give his child away, or is clearly estopped to claim custody.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.