Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 457 SW2D 929 - Auffenberg v. Hafley

Auffenberg v. Hafley’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
August 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably Usery Gourley (1997), Heberer v. Shell Oil Co. (1988)

2 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

2001970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. Thompson · 231 Mo. App. 187 - Jones v. West Side Buick Co. · Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate Company · Powers v. Shore · Smith v. Tracy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a seller has been guilty of fraud, the purchaser, upon discovery of the fraud has an election of two remedies. Under one he may make a timely rescission of the sale and recover whatever of value he has parted with. Under the other, he may keep the property and recover, by suit or counterclaim, the damages occasioned him by the fraud. The victim of a fraud may elect to pursue one of the remedies, but once having elected, he may not pursue or attempt to intermingle the remedies, for they are wholly inconsistent, the first being a disaffir-mance of the contract and the last being an affirmance. An offer to rescind is a repudiation of all right and title to the property and the basis of the right to rescind is a tender of the property back to the seller with reasonable promptness after discovery of the fraud.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.