Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 A2D 1200 - State v. Atkinson

State v. Atkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2013

20 state decisions

1401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Flick · State v. Goodall · State v. Leeman · State v. Joy · E. N. Nason, Inc. v. Land-Ho Development Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test for a lesser included offense is not whether, in the circumstances of the particular case, defendant must have committed the lesser offense if he committed the greater. Rather, the test is whether, comparing the legal definitions of the two crimes, one must conclude that the lesser offense is necessarily committed whenever the greater is.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.