Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 A.2d 26 - Mayo v. State

Mayo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Romans v. State of Maryland · Lasby v. State · State v. Palmer · State v. Norris · In re Crepeault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Objections based on defects in the commencement of the proceeding or in the charge, other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction or failure to charge an offense, may be raised only by pretrial motion as provided in Rule 15.3.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A misnomer is not a jurisdictional defect or a failure to charge an offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.