Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 F.2d 461 - United States v. Higgins

United States v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

458 F.2d 461 · 1972

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably Commonwealth v. Slaughter (1978), Commonwealth v. Fowler (1976)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

3701972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Johnson v. State of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) the manner in which the pretrial identification was conducted; (2) the witness' prior opportunity to observe the alleged criminal act; (3) the existence of any discrepancies between the defendant's actual description and any description given by the witness before the photographic identification; (4) any previous identification by the witness of some other person; (5) any previous identification of the defendant himself; (6) failure to identify the defendant on a prior occasion; and (7) the lapse of time between the alleged act and the out-of-court identification." Id. at 465 .”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.