Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 F.2d 521 - General Methods Corp. v. United States

General Methods Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

458 F.2d 521 · 1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 1995
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1995

40197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co. · Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United States · United States v. Kurt Orban Co. · General Methods Corp. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the basis for avoiding the literal interpretation of a provision must be clearly established”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.