Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 F.3d 130 - Jimenez v. Walker

Jimenez v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

458 F.3d 130 · 2006

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
September 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably al-Kidd v. Ashcroft (2009), Clark v. Perez (2008)

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

520200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · United States v. Agurs · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Murray v. Carrier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[I]f the verdict is already of questionable validity, additional evidence of relatively minor importance might be sufficient to create a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “is principally designed to protect the state courts' role in the enforcement of federal law and prevent disruption of state judicial proceedings[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.