Lee v. Minner’s Empirical Analysis
458 F.3d 194 · 2006
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
August 2013
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Dunn v. Blumstein · Doe v. Bolton · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Toomer v. Witsell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he object of the Privileges and Immunities Clause is to 'strongly ... constitute the citizens of the United States [as] one people,' by 'plac[ing] the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States, so far as the advantages resulting from citizenship in those States are concerned.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Citizens of each State [are] entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It has not been suggested ... that state citizenship or residency may never be used by a State to distinguish among persons. Suffrage, for example, always has been understood to be tied to an individual’s identification with a particular State. No one would suggest that the Privileges and Immunities Clause requires a State to open its polls to a person who declines to assert that the State is the only one where he claims a right to vote. The same is true as to qualification for an elective office of the State. Nor must a State always apply all its laws or all its services equally to anyone, resident or nonresident, who may request it to do so. Some distinctions between residents and nonresidents merely reflect the fact that this is a Nation composed of individual States, and are permitted; other distinctions are prohibited because they hinder the formation, the purpose, or the development of a single Union of those States. Only with respect to those “privileges” and “immunities” bearing upon the vitality of the Nation as a single entity must the State treat all citizens, resident and nonresident, equally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McBurney v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.