STARK VS. LACKEY’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)
Relies on 40 Cal. 4th 33 - Barrett v. Rosenthal · Davis v. Cox · Chong Yim v. City of Seattle · Piping Rock Partners, Inc. v. David Lerner Associates, Inc. · Coker v. Sassone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the comments at issue fall into one of the four categories of protected communications enumerated in NRS 41.637”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“the communication 'is truthful or is made without knowledge of its falsehood.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“good faith communication in furtherance of . . . the right to free speech in direct connection with an issue of public concern”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.