State v. McCroy’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Moses · Carmichael v. State · State v. Trotter · State v. Scherzer · Harsch v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“K.S.A. 22-3504 does not vest an appellate court with jurisdiction to consider a State's appeal solely on the claim that a sentence is illegal. Instead, for an appellate court to have jurisdiction, the case must originate from one of the limited procedural postures articulated in K.S.A. 22-3602.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark · State v. McCroy“between permitting a party to assert a claim for the first time on appeal and this court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal in the first place.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark · State v. McCroy“The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time while the defendant is serving such sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Clark · State v. McCroy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.