State v. Braxton’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1993
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Illinois v. Gates · Jones v. United States · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · State v. Duncan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[i]t is well-settled that a defendant may not complain of the insufficiency of the indictment after conviction if the offense charged has actually been identified and no prejudice has resulted from a lack of notice. See State v. Gainey, 376 So.2d 1240, 1242-43 (La.1979); State v. Murray, 357 So.2d 1121, 1123 (La.1978).” State v. Braxton, 458 So.2d 1017 , at page 1021 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.