¶1No error or abuse of discretion has been demonstrated with respect to the trial court’s rulings concerning lump sum alimony, special equity or costs. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review dismissed, 399 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1981). The court did err, however, by ordering the partition and sale of real property held by the parties as tenants by the entireties in the absence of an appropriate request and compliance with the requirements of Chapter 64, Florida Statutes (1983). Sanders v. Sanders, 351 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). See Muhlrad v. Muhlrad, 375 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); § 689.15, Fla.Stat. (1983). Accordingly, the portion of the judgment ordering the partition and sale of the real property held by the entireties is reversed; in all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
458 So. 2d 428
458 So.2d 428
9 Fla.L.Weekly 2387
Poitier v. Poitier
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 13, 1984
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-11-13
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc. · 390 So. 2d 461 - Farrington v. Farrington
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-11-13
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2009
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →