¶1We are of the view that there was enough direct testimony, coupled with hearsay testimony, to support the trial judge’s decision to revoke the defendant’s probation. Wheeler v. State, 344 So.2d 630 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1977); Rathburn v. State, 353 So.2d 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
¶2As a consequence, we do not find it necessary to address the provisions of Section 827.07(8), Florida Statutes (1983).
¶3AFFIRMED.