H.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 1984

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1984-10-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1988

1 state decisions

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 376 So. 2d 1149 - Lucas v. State · 345 So. 2d 1061 - Cumbie v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The adjudication of delinquency under review is reversed for a new hearing because the lower court improperly failed to hold a Richardson1 hearing prior to admitting incriminating statements allegedly made by the respondent and not previously revealed by the state in discovery. Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1977); Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The state’s contentions that the defense was on prior notice of the statements, see Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla.1978), or acquiesced in the court’s ruling, see Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla.1979), are totally unsustained by the record.

¶2. Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971).