Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

458 So. 2d 999

State v. Dean

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1984

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1984-11-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1985

1 state decisions

Relies on 408 So. 2d 1255 - State v. Dewey · 315 So. 2d 675 - State v. Carlisle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

¶1The defendant, Ivy Lee Dean, was charged by Bill of Information on Novem*1000ber 22, 1982, with possession of a controlled dangerous substance, pentazocine, a violation of La.R.S. 40:967 C.

¶2On June 22, 1983, following a trial by jury, the defendant was found guilty as charged by a unanimous verdict. On July 12, 1983, the defendant made a motion for a new trial which was denied, and the defendant waived any further delay in sentencing.

¶3The trial judge committed defendant to the Department of Corrections to serve four years in a State penal institution.

¶4Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence alleging four assignments of error. However, as he has failed to brief any of those assignments of error, they are considered abandoned. State v. Dewey, 408 So.2d 1255 (La.1982), and State v. Carlisle, 315 So.2d 675 (La. 1975). We are therefore limited in this appeal to a consideration of those errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence, i.e., patent errors. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2).

¶5We have conducted a careful examination of the record before us pursuant to the provisions of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920, and finding no errors patent on the record, we hereby affirm the conviction.

¶6AFFIRMED.

/458/so2d/999 · .json · Public domain