Bradley v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Pope v. Ferguson · State v. Anderson · Duckett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law, regarding criminal matters, the Court of Criminal Appeals and the judges thereof shall have the power to issue the writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, procedendo, prohibition, cer-tiorari, and other such writs as may be necessary to protect its own jurisdiction or enforce its judgments.” [Emphasis added.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““One seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court must point to some constitutional or statutory provisions conferring such right and bring himself within the procedure prescribed. See Ex parte Minor, 115 Tex.Cr.R. 634 , 27 S.W.2d 805 . This the relator had not done.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Walker v. State · Armes v. State“[Mandamus] is not a substitute for and cannot be used to perform the office of an appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.