Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

458 S.W.3d 838

State v. Mann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2015

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2015-03-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2019

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM..

¶2Jessie Mann (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction for first-degree child molestation that the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County entered after a bench trial. Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in: (1) admitting the child victim’s out-of-court statements; (2) admitting the video recording of the child victim’s deposition; and (3) permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine Defendant about his school-age Facebook friends.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, 'prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/458/sw3d/838 · .json · Public domain