Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 U.S. 259 - Michigan v. Thomas

Michigan v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

718
cited by 718 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
38
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

182 federal appellate · 55 district · 332 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 718 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably United States v. Johns (1985), State v. Badgett (1986)

182 federal appellate · 55 district · 332 state decisions — followed in 38 states

237019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross · South Dakota v. Opperman · Texas v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 718 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when police officers have probable cause to believe there is contraband inside an automobile that has been stopped on the road, the officers may conduct a warrantless search of the vehicle, even after it has been impounded and is in police custody.”
    44 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plainly inconsistent with our decisions in Chambers and Texas v. White .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Without attempting to refute the State's contention that this discovery gave the officers probable cause to believe there was contraband elsewhere in the vehicle, the [Michigan] Court of Appeals held that the absence of `exigent circumstances' precluded a warrantless search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.