Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 458 U.S. 966 - Board of Education of Rogers Arkansas v. McCluskey

Board of Education of Rogers Arkansas v. McCluskey’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
13
cited 13 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions (13 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Anderson v. Harless (1982), Michael Leavitt Governor of Utah v. Jane L (1996)

20 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions

3601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMcCcuskey v. Board of Education of Rogers, Arkansas (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Wood v. Strickland · Sumner v. Mata · Fletcher v. Weir · Hutto v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Section] 1983 does not extend the right to relitigate in federal court evidentiary questions arising in school disciplinary proceedings or the proper construction of school regulations. The system of public education that has evolved in this Nation relies necessarily upon the discretion and judgment of school administrators and school board members, and § 1983 was not intended to be a vehicle for federal court correction of errors in the exercise of that discretion which do not rise to the level of violations of specific constitutional guarantees.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “interpretation ... so extreme as to be a violation of due process,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As Justice REHNQUIST has reminded us, in 'our zeal to provide”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.