Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

459 F.2d 1045

Docket No. 71-3221.

Katz v. Aspinwell

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

May 22, 1972.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-05-22

2 counsel of record

Relies on 342 F. Supp. 286 - Katz v. Aspinwall · Nammack v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-05-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2009

1201972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert S. Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Kramer & Labaton, Sidney Kramer, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant; Callaway & Vance, Birmingham, Ala., Joseph Sternberg, New York City, of counsel.

Winston B. McCall, S. P. Keith, Jr., Wm. G. West, Jr., George R. Reynolds, Gilbert E. Johnston, Roderick M. Macleod, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellees; Pritchard, McCall & Jones, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel.

Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

After oral argument, the judgment of the District Court in this case is affirmed upon the written opinion of the District Judge, Katz v. Aspinwell, 342 F.Supp. 286 (N.D., Ala., 1971).

¶2

Affirmed.

/459/f2d/1045 · .json · Public domain