Manes v. Local Board #36’s Empirical Analysis
459 F.2d 1112 · 1972
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11 · Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16 · Clark v. Gabriel · Snell v. Wyman · Fein v. Selective Serv. System Local Bd. No. 7 of Yonkers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) that Sec. 10(b)(3) does not foreclose pre-induction judicial review in that rather rare instance [such as Oestereich and Breen] where administrative action, based on reasons unrelated to the merits of the claim to exemption or deferment, deprives the registrant of the classification to which, otherwise and concededly, he is entitled by statute, and (b) that Sec. 10(b)(3) does foreclose pre-induction judicial review in the more common situation [such as Gabriel and Boyd] where the board, authoritatively, has used its discretion and judgment in determining facts and in arriving at a classification for the registrant,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he board, authoritatively, has used its discretion and judgment in determining facts and in arriving at a classification”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.