Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

459 F.2d 1391

Docket No. 71-3598.

Eastern Federal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Royal Park West, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-Cross

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

June 9, 1972. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1972.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-06-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1973

1 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Holmberg v. Hardee Trustees · Pilkington v. Rose

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-06-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Carl R. Pennington, Jr., Ben H. Wilkinson, Tallahassee, Fla., for appellants.

Joe C. Jenkins, Jr., Charles A. Williams, Jr., Gainesville, Fla., for Royal Park West, Inc., and others.

Jackson Bryan, Palatka, Fla., for Bryan and others.

Before TUTTLE, MORGAN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

There being issues of fact as to damages for resolution by the jury and sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict under the Boeing Co. v. Shipman1 standard, and the deed having been delivered and conveying property to the grantee in full, unconditional satisfaction of the debt rather than as security to be held for the payment of the debt, under the clear terms of the agreement between the parties, so that there was no mortgage under Florida law,2 we affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects, both as to appeal and cross-appeal.

¶2

Affirmed.

1

411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969)

2

Florida Statutes Sec. 697.01(1), F.S.A.; Holmberg v. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787, 108 So. 211 (1926); Pilkington v. Rose, 88 Fla. 547, 102 So. 751 (1925)

/459/f2d/1391 · .json · Public domain