Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 F.2d 574 - Moore v. Ciccone

Moore v. Ciccone’s Empirical Analysis

459 F.2d 574 · 1972

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4244

Relies on McMann v. Richardson · Price v. Johnston · Johnson v. Avery · Cooper v. Pate · Sostre v. McGinnis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * that, regarding censorship of mail between inmates and their attorneys or the Courts, outgoing mail may not be inspected or opened; incoming mail may be opened only if manipulation of the envelope, use of fluoroscopes and metal detectors or other alternate means to opening the envelopes fail to disclose contraband and there is a real possibility that contraband will be included in such mail; in addition, if the envelope from the attorney or Court is marked 'Privileged', it cannot be opened except in the presence of the inmate addressee * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Thus, while control of the mails may be a proper function of penal administration, overly broad regulations which permit the opening and inspection of legal mail cannot be generally approved. The search for contraband, when extended to ordinary correspondence, seems both remote and speculative.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “... a rule could be promulgated that any correspondence from legal counsel which is marked 'Privileged' will be opened and inspected for contraband, but only in the presence of the inmate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.