Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 F.3d 1114 - Boxer X v. Harris

Boxer X v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

459 F.3d 1114 · 2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Hudson v. Palmer · Wilson v. Seiter · Whitley v. Albers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n our federal system of civil justice, the plaintiff is the 'master of the complaint,' see Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Sys., Inc. , 535 U.S. 826 , 831, 122 S.Ct. 1889 , 153 L.Ed.2d 13 (2002), and, under the law [ the plaintiff ] is entitled to decide which and how many claims he will assert”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.