Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 F.3d 1217 - Henyard v. McDonough

Henyard v. McDonough’s Empirical Analysis

459 F.3d 1217 · 2006

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Cummings v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections (2009), Stewart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (2007)

19 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

180200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Gregg v. Georgia · Atkins v. Virginia · Penry v. Lynaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The totality of the circumstances indicate that (1) the police explained Henyard’s rights to him twice; (2) Henyard’s intelligence, although below average, was not so low that he could not understand his rights; (3) the transcript of the interrogation and Henyard’s responses to the police give no indication that he was confused or that he misunderstood the seriousness of the interrogation; (4) the police did not engage in any trickery, deception, or improper interrogation tactics; and (5) Henyard had previous experience with the justice system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “AEDPA”), our review of a final state habeas judgment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.