Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 F.3d 39 - United States v. Roberson

United States v. Roberson’s Empirical Analysis

459 F.3d 39 · 2006

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2022 · most notably Burgess v. United States (2008), Parker v. Gerrish (2008)

35 federal appellate · 10 district · 1 state decisions

320200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 824 (§ 304 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · Shepard v. United States · Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The term ‘felony drug offense’ means an offense that is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year under any law of the United States or of a State or foreign country that prohibits or restricts conduct relating to narcotic drugs, marihuana, anabolic steroids, or depressant or stimulant substances.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a litigant must lodge a specific objection and state the grounds for the objection after the court has charged the jury and before the jury begins deliberations”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “highly probable that the error did not influence the verdict”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.